What does risk management plan mean?
risk management plan belongs to the EU conflict-minerals due-diligence framework. It should be tied to mineral scope, importer role, smelter/refiner position, conflict-affected or high-risk area context, and OECD-aligned due-diligence evidence rather than treated as a generic sustainability label.
Official definitions by source
EU Conflict Minerals
Regulation (EU) 2017/821 laying down supply chain due diligence obligations for Union importers of tin, tantalum and tungsten, their ores, and gold originating from conflict-affected and high-risk areas
the written response of a Union importer to the identified supply chain risks based on Annex III to the OECD Due Diligence Guidance
Article 2 definitions for EU conflict-minerals due diligence. Source-specific to tin, tantalum, tungsten, their ores, and gold.
Reference: Article 2, point (r)
View official source
Practical application
Implementation records should capture mineral or metal scope, actor role, source location, conflict-affected/high-risk area assessment, chain-of-custody or traceability record, due-diligence scheme or policy, risk-management decision, audit/disclosure evidence, and relevant OECD Guidance link where applicable.
Minespider commentary
For Minespider, conflict-minerals terms should route sourcing claims into auditable objects: mineral/material scope, importer declaration, smelter/refiner identity, custody sequence, area-risk classification, due-diligence policy, grievance/risk records, and recycled-metal or by-product evidence where relevant.
Common confusions
- Treating conflict-minerals terms as generic ESG due-diligence language outside tin, tantalum, tungsten, ores, and gold scope.
- Collapsing Union importer, smelter/refiner, and downstream product actors into one responsibility role.
- Using chain-of-custody or traceability labels without sequence-of-custody and economic-operator evidence.
Related regulations
Related terms