What does re-use mean?
Re-use matters for battery passports because lifecycle records need to show when a battery, module, or component remains in use, moves into a second-use pathway, or requires preparation before re-use can be justified.
re-use
Re-use matters for battery passports because lifecycle records need to show when a battery, module, or component remains in use, moves into a second-use pa
1 context sourcessingle_source
Standards and implementation context
These entries are non-verbatim context summaries. They are not presented as public legal definitions.
DIN DKE SPEC 99100
DIN DKE SPEC 99100:2025-02 — Requirements for data attributes of the battery passport
DIN DKE SPEC 99100 uses re-use as battery-passport implementation context for lifecycle pathways where a battery or related object continues to be used rather than moving directly to recycling or disposal.
Implementation-context summary only; not a verbatim DIN definition. This is a copyrighted standard, so Minespider should use it as standards context rather than republishing the standard text.
Reference: Section 3 lifecycle terminology
Practical application
In implementation, re-use should be separated from preparation for re-use, repurposing, and recycling. The data question is not only whether something was used again, but whether its condition, identity, safety, and responsibility chain support that outcome.
Minespider commentary
Minespider should use re-use as a circularity-outcome term that depends on credible status and condition evidence. It helps explain why passport data can support higher-value lifecycle choices before material recovery.
Common confusions
- Do not confuse re-use with recycling; re-use keeps the object or component in use, while recycling recovers materials through a different process.
- Do not confuse re-use with preparation for re-use, which is a defined waste-management operation in EU waste law contexts.
- Do not use re-use as a vague sustainability claim without condition, safety, and responsibility evidence.